HOME | SPRINT CUP | NATIONWIDE | CTS | ARCA | PRO CUP | OSR | GAS | WoO LATE MODELS | WoO SPRINT | CAROLINA CLASH | NEWS

Brian France and Tony George to form New NASCAR Open Wheel Series?

 

August 11, 2006

Jay Staton - SCR

 

Actually this is NOT the official announcement, but it does make for an intriguing concept.

 

In order for some of the newer stock car fans to understand open wheel racing, a little history is perhaps in order.

 

“Indy Car” racing actually predates stock car racing, and had it’s heyday back in the 1950’s and early 60’s. The cars looked like longer, lower, sleeker sprint cars and, in fact, the design, construction, ownership, and drivers were all from the same group as sprint cars. Amazingly the tires were remarkably narrow (wider designs would blow out at that time) and although low in drag, there was virtually no down force to stick the cars to the track, forcing mechanical grip to get through the corners.

 

The engines were non-turbocharged offenhausers and the occasional Novi. The men that drove them were just that—men, such as A.J. Foyt, Parnelli Jones, Jim Hurtubise, and the Rathman Brothers... The cars were also of very lightweight tube frame construction devoid, of course, of a roll cage, and death was a constant possibility.

 

Meanwhile, stock car racing was in it’s infancy, and the cars were just that—largely stock, and significantly slower. In the early sixties stock cars had door handles and stock floorpans and chrome bumpers. The Cup series was without sponsorship and was called the “Grand National” series, and the tracks were largely within a 200 mile radius of Charlotte in the south.

 

The Indy cars were purpose built from the ground up, the trailers shinier, the pit crew’s uniforms matched, and the drivers spoke without a southern drawl. They were thought of as the elite division and the upper class type fans followed the Indy car circuit more closely while the short track types favored Darlington or Daytona. However, all race fans generally watched all the races, because the competition and the personalities all had drawing power.

But in the late sixties, seventies, and eighties, the pendulum started to swing. Indy cars became rear engine based, the drivers sunk into the cockpits largely out of fan view, turbochargers came into vogue, and huge wings were employed for down force. The speeds went up, but slowly the cars began to spread out on the track.

 

And then there was the big split. The car owners ran the series in the eighties and there were whisperings that they wanted part of the gate and concessions, as opposed to prize money.

 

Tony George, who runs the Indianapolis Speedway, elected to take matters into his own hands and formed his own series (the IRL), with somewhat reduced technology, while the car owner based series boycotted and ran their own deal (CART). Both series continued to have lackluster and sporadic wheel to wheel competition, and reduced car counts.

 

Formula One, of course, is Indy Car racing exaggerated to the next level, and then some. Budgets of three hundred million per year, sponsorship by entire nations, and football fields of space between the cars are the norm, not the exception. Bernie Eccolstone is the somewhat tyrannical director (dictator?) of the series, and, among other things, has proclaimed that women should be in the kitchen, not in the cockpit, or something similar.  Due to a tire dispute, they recently held a race at Indianapolis featuring fewer cars than NASCAR sends home on a typical Sunday…

 

Currently, the Formula One followers look at Indy Cars (both groups) as archaic, and the Indy Car types look at Stock Car Racing as a Ricky-Bobby-kind of a world.

 

Meanwhile stock cars have grown more and more technical, although, interestingly, are still based on what they raced in 1970. Competition is unbelievable, and mainstream America has fallen in love with the honesty displayed in the driver’s personalities, and the excitement of constant wheel to wheel battles. Stock Car racing is where the money is in the United States, period. ANY track owner will attest to this.

 

Additionally, many say that the Brickyard 400 has become the premiere event at Indianapolis, and drivers ranging from Tony Stewart to Juan Pablo Montoya have defected from the open wheel ranks to stock cars.

 

What is open wheel racing to do? There is talk of a re-union of the two series, but the question that raises is self evident—is that not simply two times zero?

 

Here is a completely viable alternative: Ignore the entire past from the beginning of rear engine cars to the present! Ignore Formula One. If the rest of the world wants to go literally out of their minds every thirty seconds or so when a Formula One car passes, let them have it.

 

This is America, and we are leaders, not followers.

 

This may seem ludicrous on the surface, but remember, Americans vote every Sunday with their ticket money and their cable channel, and, by and large, we are not remotely interested in what the open wheel set—any and all of them-- are doing!

 

Advertise on StockCar Review, with advertising rates starting as low as $10.00 per month, you cannot find a better deal. Email us at scr@stockcarreview.com for more information.
 
 

The Solution:

 

A joint series first and foremost has to be under the NASCAR banner. Lets call it the Indy-Modified class. Although everyone complains about NASCAR from time to time (this column included), they still put on the best show on earth, and there is no close second. Tony George has Indianapolis, so he needs to be involved. Lets make him the “Grand Poobah” of the series or something similar.

 

The cars: This is so incredibly simple that development to track time could be done in two years, tops.

 

Not unlike the “Daytona Prototype” sports car series, which also has much better car count and competition that the “elite” American Lemans series, specifications could be drawn up that car builders must adhere to.

 

Picture something between an open wheeled Cup car, a Supermodified, and a 60’s Watson roadster.

 

Engines—why not run Cup engines? Same specifications, four manufacturers ready to support the deal right off the bat. Similarly, same tires, same transmissions (ok, use a five speed if you must run on road courses), and differentials. Fuel Cells in a safe location. Make SURE that engine is up front in the chassis, and make sure that the thing looks fast, not ungainly.

 

Limit the size of the wings, front and rear, so that mechanical grip far exceeds aero-down force, like Cup, and like the old days at Indianapolis. This and a smaller NASCAR-style cage would protect the most precious resource on the planet—human life. Indy cars from both series have a serious loss-of-life problem. Christian DaMatta is seriously ill with a closed head injury after contact with a deer, but it could just as easily be a suspension component or tire and wheel assembly invading the cockpit on any given weekend. A few years ago  Mario Andretti’s car got approximately 50 feet in the air after hitting a piece of metal about the size of a softball. It is not a matter of if, but when, one of these things flies into the grandstands. More mechanical grip, more weight, less downforce—all add up to cars slowing down for the corners and largely staying earthbound.

 

Would the speeds drop? Of course, but who cares? They would run much closer together, look cooler, sound better, and best of all, just as today’s drivers can switch between Craftsman trucks, Busch and Nextel Cup cars, the transition to Indy-Modifieds would be no problem.

 

In fact, Truck and Busch races could be at one venue and Cup and the Indy-Modifieds could run as companion classes at another. Or any combination that was the most financially viable.

 

Once they hit the track, the Indy-Modifieds would not take ten years to take off; they would take one, at most.

 

Mr. France and Mr. George, the stock car fan base is available now, the drivers and sponsors and chassis builders and engines are available now, and the  big money is on the table. What are you waiting for?

 

Questions, Comments;

nascaracinjay@yahoo.com

 

The views and opinions in this article are that of the writer and not necessarily that of SCR

 

RSRBlackCheckS.jpg

Enter content here

Enter content here

Enter content here

Born on: July 8, 2005

Copyright Symbol 2006 StockCar Review.