HOME | SPRINT CUP | NATIONWIDE | CTS | ARCA | PRO CUP | OSR | GAS | WoO LATE MODELS | WoO SPRINT | CAROLINA CLASH | NEWS

NASCAR Update: The Good (NASCAR?), the Bad (Montoya?), and the Answer

 

March 8, 2007

Jay Staton - SCR

 

The Good:  

 

The “Car of Tomorrow” (COT), soon to become the “Car of Today”, of course making today’s vehicle the “Car of Yesterday”, was successfully tested at Bristol

 

The teams have finally come to grips with the fact that the COT is here to stay. After the huge investment NASCAR has made, why was there ever any doubt?  

 

At any rate, that huge investment qualifies as “The Good” this week. NASCAR could have achieved their performance gain by simply requiring the teams to use the blunt nosed front fascia with the “splitter” and the rear wing. Instead they spent a ton of money and years of research to come up with not only a car that was less aero dependent but also far safer. 

 

David Reutimann will be the first to attest that outside of the obvious Help from Upstairs, the Car of Tomorrow--with the driver placed further back in the chassis and with the designed-in ability to slow the rate that the driver’s body stops in a hard impact--would have suited him just fine at California.

   

Advertise on StockCar Review, with advertising rates starting as low as $16.50 per month, you cannot find a better deal. Email us at scr@stockcarreview.com for more information.
 

 

It does appear that the splitter is fragile, and while the controlling types out there are quick to say “Well, you just shouldn’t run into the guy in front of you”, that is simply unrealistic—and ALL fans, new and seasoned alike, do not want to see their guy in the pits after a minor bump. This can be fixed with a plastic nose that is one piece which has an integral splitter-like lower lip—similarly to last years truck front end or, interestingly, the nose on the Grand Prix that The King last raced back in 1992, but with a more pronounced lower leading edge. 

 

The Bad: 

 

NASCAR again appeared to have made a series of “calls” in Mexico—involving restarts, involving returning from pit road, involving rough driving (as usual, contradicting another call involving Ricky Rudd spinning out Davey Allison at Sears Point in 1991 which resulted in Rudd’s disqualification)… all of which added up for a Hispanic driver winning in a Hispanic venue. Yes indeed, race fans, diversification NASCAR style. Here is big news for the sanctioning body—Juan Pablo Montoya (JPM) doesn’t need anyone’s help to win. In fact, he is making Chip Ganassi’s mid pack equipment look good week after week.  

 

Meanwhile, veteran fans know that seemingly contrived wins have been happening forever, they just seem a little more obvious now. And new fans, well, imagine a lawyer that has tuned in, been bitten by the bug, and then sat through the “rules” for six races or so. To put this into perspective, ask yourself how often YOU take Monster Trucks or Drifting seriously...  

 

Ironically the efforts to affect the outcome of a race to be more dramatic are clearly hurting more than they are helping. Brian (France), tighten up the troops behind closed doors. Decide on the rules on and off the track, put them in writing, and then execute. It is called C-O-N-S-I-S-T-E-N-C-Y. 
  

More Not-So-Good: 

 

As Brian Vickers can attest, taking out one’s teammate is never a good thing. But there is enough blame to go around for both Mr. Pruett and Mr. Montoya.  

 

First, Scott Pruett and Montoya are both great open wheel drivers. I have respected Pruett’s abilities for years in both Indy Cars as well as Grand Am Sports car racing. Like Boris Said, I have no doubt that he could be a serious contender in Cup full time.

 

Similarly, JPM is unlike any driver to make the switch from Formula One. He is famous and humble and hungry all at the same time. You can bet that he has the uneasy attention of the entire Cup garage.  

 

But both ARE from the open wheel ranks. Pruett took the fastest line through the corner-- that is, late entry, hard apex, fast acceleration out of the turn. The only problem, as any short track driver can tell you, is that you cannot do that if someone faster is behind; instead it is a MUST to protect the bottom, and force the other guy to the outside. Juan Pablo Montoya, similarly, is not a veteran that, say knows with Jeff-Gordon-like surgical precision just how hard to hit a guy to nudge him out of the way without spinning him out. The actual “blame” for the incident can be debated, but the results cannot.

   

SCR is looking for writers in all the series we cover, if interested email us at scr@stockcarreview.com to receive further information.
 

 

JPM got away with it on this occasion, but it is safe to bet that NASCAR will be keeping an eye on him and as big as he is right now, he is not above the Kevin Harvick/Kurt Busch/Jimmy Spencer/etc. treatment. Of course, Harvick/Busch/Spencer/etc. all will also be keeping an eye on him with their own brand of judgment as well. 

 

And Pruett, well, although he believes he was wronged and that justified his post race remarks, this has not improved his overall reputation. And then there is Chip Ganassi, for whom Pruett is employed. Montoya is Ganassi’s golden boy, and it is a safe bet that Ganassi does not like dirty laundry publicly aired, especially if it places him in the middle of it. 

 

And…The Answer: 

 

All of the above, interestingly, tie in to decisions we all have to make on a daily basis. The Car of Tomorrow was an inherently “good” decision. Questionable judgment calls from the Tower and questionable on and off track behavior were all… not. The trick, in every case, is to make good decisions instead of bad ones. 

 

That seemingly simplistic answer really is simpler than it seems, either at first glance or after many difficult life experiences. Instead of trying to shape the truth, Believe in the Truth, and then live by it as often as you can and the details of Life will take care of themselves.

  

  Questions, Comments;

Email Jay 

 

The views and opinions in this article are that of the writer(s) and not necessarily that of SCR

 

 

Print

Enter content here

Enter content here

Enter content here

Born on: July 8, 2005

Copyright Symbol 2006 StockCar Review.